Renault 4 vs Ford Puma Gen-E: can French fancy declaw its EV rival?

There are two distinct routes that car makers can take to electrify their model line-ups. Depending on time frames and cost, some companies have been able to create bespoke electric car platforms, with scalable tech that can be adjusted to suit different requirements. That’s the path Renault has chosen with the R4, a car that follows hot on the heels of the numerically larger, but physically smaller, Renault 5 supermini.

As the Captur is to the Clio, so the Renault 4 is to the 5, with its retro-inspired design adorning a larger SUV-style body that offers more space than the supermini’s, but also features virtually identical technology on board.

The second option is to electrify an existing combustion-engined platform. While Ford offers dedicated EV tech in its line-up, it has gone down this route with the new Ford Puma Gen-E, which is based on the firm’s best seller, but without a trace of combustion power.

In both instances, these small SUVs aim to deliver a usable range and decent everyday practicality in a package that is priced at a comparable point to the petrol-engined alternatives. But which one delivers the best overall experience?

Renault 4

46

Since the Renault 5 took design inspiration from the company’s back catalogue, the French firm couldn’t really do anything else with the SUV variant. The 4 is longer than the 5 hatchback overall and also has a longer wheelbase, so it’s better suited to family duties. Power comes from the larger 52kWh battery found in the supermini, while prices are competitive: they start from £27,000 for Evolution trim, while Techno (our pick) costs £29,000 and the top-spec Iconic model in our pictures is £31,000.

Tester's notes

The Renault 4 draws design inspiration from the firm’s back catalogue, but the E-Tech model is light years ahead in terms of quality. While the dash layout is identical to the R5’s, the separate climate controls and stubby infotainment stalk positioned lower down on the steering column will be familiar to anyone who has driven a modern Renault. It does mean the right side of the steering wheel is a little busy, with the infotainment control, the wiper stalk and drive selector all closely packed together.

Ford Puma Gen-E

46

While the petrol Puma offers a few engine choices and trim options, the Gen-E line-up has been kept simple. There’s just one powertrain, comprising a 53kWh battery (43kWh of which is usable) and a 166bhp electric motor that sends power to the front wheels. There are only two trim options, with the Select model coming 
in at five pounds under £30,000 and the higher-spec Premium costing £2,000 extra. However, even the base model tested here comes with a generous list of kit.

Tester's notes

It’s one thing testing electric cars in the summer months, but in winter, colder temperatures will take a chunk out of the Puma’s driving range. Ford mitigates against this by fitting the Gen-E with a heat pump as standard, which is surprising because it’s an option on the pricier Explorer and Capri. The Puma also comes with Ford’s excellent Quickclear windscreen, but a heated steering wheel and front seats are part of a £350 option pack. Most rival EVs feature these as standard as a quick way to get warm.

Used - available now

2020 BMW

5 Series

21,824 milesAutomaticDiesel2.0L

Cash £23,299

View 5 Series

2023 MG

ZS

19,810 milesManualPetrol1.5L

Cash £14,299

View ZS

2020 Suzuki

Vitara

19,348 milesManualPetrol1.4L

Cash £17,699

View Vitara

2022 Renault

Clio

26,117 milesManualPetrol1.0L

Cash £12,249

View Clio

Did you know you can sell your car through Auto Express? We’ll help you get a great price and find a great deal on a new car, too.

Head-to-head

On the road

The Puma is one of the best-handling small SUVs in petrol guise, and despite being around 200kg heavier, the Gen-E retains that car’s fun character. In fact, the weight of the battery means it rides a bit more smoothly. It’s not as comfortable as the Renault 4, though, which offers a soft edge that promotes cruising comfort. In terms of acceleration, there’s not much in it, but the Puma feels punchier off the line.

Tech highlights

The Renault’s cabin is carried over wholesale from the R5, so you get a modern-looking layout with plenty of tech and user-friendly details. It’s a similar story with the Puma Gen-E, which features the same 12-inch touchscreen display as the petrol version, although as with that car, the screen’s size and position mean that the steering wheel can end up obscuring some of the information nearest the driver.

46

Price and running

Both cars are great value for EVs, and it’s worth noting that the electric Puma costs less than some of the highest-spec versions of the petrol model. Efficiency was strong for both cars, but the Renault’s figure of 4.0mi/kWh was eclipsed by the Ford’s, at 4.7mi/kWh. It means that while the Puma has nearly 10kWh less of usable capacity, its actual driving range is similar to that of the Renault’s, at just over 200 miles on test.

Practicality

The Renault 4 is shorter than the Puma but has a longer wheelbase, while a wider cabin and taller roof mean it feels more spacious for back-seat passengers. A very low load lip is another benefit that the Renault carries over the Ford, but the Gen-E has the greater overall volume courtesy of its Gigabox, which is bigger than the petrol Puma’s Megabox. Surprisingly, the Ford also has under-bonnet storage – the Renault doesn’t.

Safety

There are four-star Euro NCAP safety ratings for both cars here, with the Puma’s score being carried over from the petrol version. On the R4, kit such as a door-opening warning and rear pedestrian-crossing alert when reversing are available solely on the top-spec version. The Puma only offers the latter, plus front parking sensors, adaptive cruise and blind-spot detection as part of a £950 Advanced Driver Assistance Pack.

Ownership

Warranty coverage is only average for the Puma, with a typical three-year/60,000-mile plan offered, although it can be extended at extra cost. For the Renault 4 there is four years and 100,000 miles of cover. As for servicing, intervals are every 24 months for both cars, although the Renault has an 18,000-mile limit. Ford includes the first five years of servicing in the price of the Puma to help reduce costs even further.

Verdict

Winner: Renault 4

46

What you’re looking at here are possibly the two best small electric SUVs currently on sale, and choosing a winner is a tough call. However, we think that the Renault 4 has an advantage over the Ford, courtesy of its extra passenger space and slightly longer range.

The striking retro-inspired looks help the R4 to stand out from the crowd, while the user-friendly touchscreen tech is easy to live with and the boot offers a useful amount of space. We’d like to see faster DC charging, and rear space is still a little compromised, but overall the Renault 4 is a great small electric SUV.

BUY A NEW RENAULT 4 NOW

Runner-up: Ford Puma Gen-E

46

Fans of the petrol Puma won’t be disappointed with the electrified version. The battery’s extra weight hasn’t impacted the handling too severely, and has actually boosted comfort a little, while no compromises have been made in terms of passenger or boot space. That does mean the back seats are still a little on the small side, but if you regularly travel two-up, then this won’t be an issue.

Most impressive is the efficiency that the Puma returned on test, which made up for the relatively small battery. Add in competitive pricing, and the Gen-E deserves to sell well.

BUY A NEW FORD PUMA GEN-E NOW

Prices and specs

Great small EV leasing deals

Mini Aceman

New Mini AcemanFrom £286 ppm**

Skoda Elroq

New Skoda ElroqFrom £295 ppm**

Alfa Romeo Junior

New Alfa Romeo JuniorFrom £370 ppm**

Peugeot 2008

New Peugeot 2008From £266 ppm**

KIA EV3

New KIA EV3From £344 ppm**

Volvo Ex30

New Volvo Ex30From £330 ppm**