Skip advert
Advertisement

“Motoring associations are too polite to say how road safety is being policed”

Mike Rutherford looks at what should be done to improve road safety in the UK

Opinion - potholes

When it comes to your road safety and wellbeing, do you trust ​the men from the Department for Transport or the anonymous agency workers allegedly managing Britain’s network of highways?

Are you confident that blokes from the council properly fill in potholes, refresh white lines and signs, fix broken pavements and bollards and clean or grit the street?

Advertisement - Article continues below

Have you faith in those who manage our archaic speed limit system? And do you suspect the public and private sector enforcement agencies often fail to identify and eliminate major problems, because it’s easier and more lucrative for them to police minor ones? It hurts me to confess that my confidence in the organisations and ‘systems’ mentioned above is fast disappearing.

Safety organisations, motoring associations and other interested parties are too polite to say how well or badly they believe road safety is now managed and policed. But if each outfit could name one problem that needs tackling immediately to reduce RAIDs (road accidents, injuries, deaths), what would it be?

Brake wants a Road Collision Investigation Unit where accident data is compiled and acted upon. IAM RoadSmart craves more road safety education in schools, mated to annual targets in accident reductions. Serving or former police officers-cum-instructors from the XCOPS driver training organisation insist that poor observation, insufficient mirror checks, plus lack of awareness are the main areas drivers need guidance on.

Top of the RAC’s wishlist is a pledge from every driver not to use a handheld phone at the wheel, coupled with a commitment from Government to do more about this “epidemic”. The AA told me its priority is a doubling of Emergency Refuge Areas (ERAs) on Smart Motorways. Volvo, the company widely regarded as the traditional champion of safety, is far more adventurous in its expectations for the near future, saying: “The continuous development of autonomous drive technology is taking us closer to our vision that, by 2020, no one will be killed or seriously injured in a new Volvo car.” If this is to be believed, it might just have hit on the sales line of the decade.

True, factors such as vehicle styling, price, mpg, ride quality and reliability matter. But surely nothing matters more than keeping yourself and your fellow car occupants alive and free from injury?

Do you agree with Mike? Let us know in the comments section below…

Skip advert
Advertisement
Chief columnist

Mike was one of the founding fathers of Auto Express in 1988. He's been motoring editor on four tabloid newspapers - London Evening News, The Sun, News of the World & Daily Mirror. He was also a weekly columnist on the Daily Telegraph, The Independent and The Sunday Times. 

Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

These used cars from 1985 just became tax-free classics
These used cars from 1985 just became tax-free classics header

These used cars from 1985 just became tax-free classics

Is it time to get on board with these 40-year-old cars that have just qualified for the historic vehicle road tax exemption?
Features
12 Jan 2025
Car Deal of the Day: simply brilliant new Skoda Elroq SUV for under £300 per month
Skoda Elroq - side static

Car Deal of the Day: simply brilliant new Skoda Elroq SUV for under £300 per month

Our Deal of the Day for 12 January is a great price for Skoda’s supremely comfortable and very spacious new electric SUV
News
12 Jan 2025
Lexus LBX Takumi long-term test: impeccable quality meets surprising inefficiency
Auto Express senior news reporter Alastair Crooks standing next to the Lexus LBX while holding a giant Uno playing card

Lexus LBX Takumi long-term test: impeccable quality meets surprising inefficiency

First report: this new compact hybrid cross pulled an UNO reverse card on us
Long-term tests
12 Jan 2025