Skip advert
Advertisement

Mercedes C63 AMG DR520

Blast-off in fastest, most exclusive C-Class!

Find your next car here
Compare deals from trusted partners on this car and previous models.
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Value my car
Fast, no-nonsense car selling
Value my car

We doubt Mercedes-Benz Brooklands will have any trouble selling the 20 fastest C-Class AMGs money can buy, as the production run is so limited. The revisions to the superb AMG-built V8 engine only help to increase the appeal of one of the best super-saloons on sale. But the fact that the DR520 costs nearly £10,000 more than a standard C63, and offers only minor benefits, makes it hard to recommend over the standard performance model.

Advertisement - Article continues below

FROM the silky smooth E-Class Cabriolet to this sledgehammer C-Class! The DR520 is based on Mercedes’ already-potent C63 AMG, and is the fastest C-Class money can buy. It’s been created by the firm’s flagship UK dealer,Mercedes-Benz Brooklands, and only 20 cars – 15 saloons and five estates – will be built.

Buyers will have the choice of matt white or black paint, with titanium-finish alloy wheels and extra badging. Inside is a set of sports seats and Alcantara trim, but the main changes are reserved for the engine.

Officially, DR520 stands for ‘Dyno Rated at 520 metric horsepower’. That equates to 513bhp, or 62bhp more than the standard car delivers.

This has been achieved by adding the AMG Performance Pack Plus, which brings forged pistons, new con rods and a revised crankshaft. Ask the AMG engineers at Brooklands in Surrey, and they reckon DR should stand for de-restricted, as top speed has been raised from 155mph to 187mph.

Regardless of its name, this car is incredibly quick. The engine is great, providing a broad spread of torque and effortless acceleration in any gear, at any speed. It sounds fantastic, emitting a guttural roar from its quad exhausts.

The seven-speed auto gearbox is super-smooth, the steering is very positive and the brakes excellent. But the handling can’t match that of a BMW M3 – partly because the C63 weighs 1,795kg, but mostly due to the suspension being too firm for UK roads.

Expansion gaps send thumps through the cabin, compromising the otherwise impressive refinement, while poorly surfaced B-roads jiggle passengers around. The major issue with this car, though, is price. The DR520 costs £9,995 more than a standard C63, and provides relatively small rewards. The extra power makes only a minor difference, while the new top speed isn’t much use away from Germany’s autobahns.

Skip advert
Advertisement

New & used car deals

Nissan Juke

Nissan Juke

RRP £19,785Avg. savings £4,638 off RRP*Used from £9,995
Hyundai Tucson

Hyundai Tucson

RRP £29,820Avg. savings £5,344 off RRP*Used from £10,195
Toyota Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

RRP £27,145Avg. savings £2,383 off RRP*Used from £15,483
Volkswagen Tiguan

Volkswagen Tiguan

RRP £38,030Avg. savings £3,560 off RRP*Used from £20,799
* Average savings are calculated daily based on the best dealer prices on Auto Express vs manufacturer RRP
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

What do car journalists drive? The cars our experts spent their own cash on
Auto Express team members standing with their own cars

What do car journalists drive? The cars our experts spent their own cash on

The Auto Express content team is fortunate enough to drive many cars on a regular basis. But that knowledge sometimes translates into unusual private …
Features
29 Dec 2025
New Skoda Fabia 130 2026 review: a likeable warm hatch, but it’s no vRS
Skoda Fabia 130 - front tracking

New Skoda Fabia 130 2026 review: a likeable warm hatch, but it’s no vRS

The new 130 is the hottest Fabia we’ve seen in a while, but it’s also one of the most expensive
Road tests
29 Dec 2025
Jaguar will prove the naysayers wrong by building a monolith of design and taste
Jaguar design - opinion, header image

Jaguar will prove the naysayers wrong by building a monolith of design and taste

Jordan Katsianis thinks the criticism of Jaguar’s bold new approach is misplaced. If anything, it isn’t bold enough.
Opinion
29 Dec 2025