Skip advert
Advertisement

Ford Focus

One year and 18,000 miles later, we give our final verdict on life with the Focus ST-2

  • ENGINE: with lots of torque and no turbo lag, the five-cylinder unit provides searing acceleration. It sounds brilliant, too.HANDLING: the engineers have done a good job. The ST mixes crisp steering and a fine chassis balance with a comfortable ride.SEATS: they may be mounted too high, but the Recaro seats are the best I have ever tried, providing lots of support for my 6ft 3in frame.
  • ECONOMY: so thirsty! Even the most light-footed cruising returned little more than 30mpg. Hard driving saw it drop below 20mpg.MANOEUVRABILITY: the penalty for quick steering is a lack of lock, which makes five-point turns a regular occurrence.TRACTION: it’s fine in the dry, but lacking in the wet with torque steer under hard acceleration, particularly on poor road surfaces.
Find your Ford Focus
Offers from our trusted partners on this car and its predecessors...
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Value my car
Fast, no-nonsense car selling
Value my car
Advertisement

It’s all been a bit of a blur! That’s the best way to describe my 12 months with the Focus ST. The fast Ford has had a hectic year at Auto Express, racking up nearly 18,000 miles, completing several group tests and track battles with supercars along the way.

But has it kept me smiling? Most definitely. I raved about the ST’s 222bhp 2.5-litre five-cylinder turbo in my first report (Issue 921), and if there’s one memory that will stay with me, it’s the engine.

With an offbeat warble under hard acceleration and heaps of performance, the punchy unit gave the Focus huge appeal. The handling impressed, too. Despite battling against a group of motors that included a Porsche 911 Turbo and Lamborghini Gallardo, EK06OHF held its own at our Greatest Drives feature. Our test team loved its communicative steering, front-end grip and brilliant poise.

However, while dry traction was good, it suffered in the wet, as 320Nm of torque struggled to reach the tarmac. Speed bumps and potholes easily messed with the wheel alignment, too.

Tyre wear wasn’t too bad, though. Despite a hard life, the original front Continental Sport Contact 2s lasted 12,000 miles. And when it came to a service 500 miles later, I was pleased with the reasonable bill of £223 and the efficiency of dealer Dagenham Motors in Highbury, north London.

Other costs included a new rear window, after the ST was the victim of a break-in, and quite a lot of fuel receipts – we averaged 23.5mpg.

The result was a range of barely 220 miles, which limited the ST’s otherwise excellent long-distance ability. Further gripes include the lack of steering lock, which made manoeuvring frustrating, and a cabin that never felt really special.

However, options such as sat-nav and a Bluetooth phone connection were easy to operate, while the five-door body is practical. Overall, the ST is hard to beat. Not many cars can match its character, performance and comfort.
It will be sorely missed...

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

New cars that plummet in value can make brilliant used buys
Opinion - Vauxhall Corsa-e

New cars that plummet in value can make brilliant used buys

Editor Paul Barker takes a closer look at our 2024 Used Car Awards
Opinion
20 Nov 2024
A £10k electric car with a 100-mile range would surely be a sales success
Opinion - cheap EV

A £10k electric car with a 100-mile range would surely be a sales success

Mike Rutherford thinks there would be demand for an electric car with a modest 100-mile range if it only cost £10k
Opinion
17 Nov 2024
Best used cars to buy 2024
Best used cars 2024

Best used cars to buy 2024

From city cars to large SUVs, here’s our annual pick of the star performers that’ll save you thousands when you buy them used instead of new
Best cars & vans
20 Nov 2024