Skoda Fabia Estate vs Nissan Note
Skoda’s new Fabia Estate meets Nissan’s Note in practical small car battle
A decade ago, most manufacturers had a supermini estate in their price lists, but in recent years these practical models have gradually been phased out in favour of more fashionable crossovers. However, Skoda has remained committed to the spacious small car concept, and has just pulled the wraps off its new Fabia Estate.
Now in its third generation, the versatile supermini delivers a vast 530-litre load bay and a whole host of family friendly features. It also incorporates the same sharp styling cues as its hatchback cousins, plus it promises to be every bit as good to drive and cost effective to run. Prices start at £12,460, and here we test the 89bhp 1.4-litre TDI diesel in top-of-the-range £17,385 SE L guise.
So what other options are there if you want to maximise space and minimise running costs? With its blend of compact dimensions and MPV-inspired versatility, the Nissan Note has always stood out. Clever packaging means the British-built model can combine big saloon-rivalling rear legroom with more boot space than many family hatchbacks. And in £17,370 1.5 dCi Tekna trim, it’ll cost very little to run. So which of our contenders wins this space race?
More reviews
Car group tests
- Vauxhall Corsa vs Skoda Fabia: we find the superior supermini
- Renault Clio vs Skoda Fabia vs Honda Jazz group test review: a battle for supermini supremacy
- Skoda Fabia vs Volkswagen Polo: 2023 twin test review
- The best long-term car tests 2022
- Ford Fiesta vs Skoda Fabia vs Toyota Yaris: 2022 group test review
- Skoda Fabia vs Renault Clio vs Vauxhall Corsa-e: 2022 group test review
In-depth reviews
Long-term tests
Road tests
Click on the links above to read each review, then read on for our verdict.
Head-to-head
Space race
The Skoda looks to have a decisive advantage in this encounter. With the rear seats in place there’s a 530-litre load bay – that’s 119 litres more than in Nissan, even with its siding bench pushed far forward.
However, fold the seats flat and the Note holds 1,495 litres, while the Fabia accommodates only 1,395 litres. Plus, the Nissan’s false floorcreates a flat load area (below); to get the same effect in the Fabia, you pay £110 for the variable boot floor.
Touchscreens
All Fabias get a slick touchscreen infotainment system. However, there’s no sat-nav option; instead you use MirrorLink software to beam route-finding instructions and maps from your Android phone. The Note’s NissanConnect screen is smaller and looks dated, but does feature sat-nav as standard.
Engines
Skoda and Nissan have taken different approaches with their diesel engines. The Fabia’s 1.4-litre TDI features three cylinders and twin overhead camshafts, and meets Euro 6 emissions standards. The Note’s 1.5-litre four-cylinder from Renault features a single cam and only meets Euro 5 levels.
Verdict
1st: Skoda Fabia Estate
If you’re looking for the greatest carrying capacity for your cash, then the Fabia Estate takes some beating. Its 530-litre boot shames models from the class above, plus it’s packed with neat storage solutions. The Skoda is also good to drive, while its no nonsense cabin is well equipped and feels a cut above the Nissan’s for quality. The three-cylinder diesel is noisy, but it’s a punchy performer and costs peanuts to run.
2nd: Nissan Note
If you frequently carry rear seat passengers, then the spacious Note deserves a second look. At the heart of the Nissan’s appeal is its brilliantly packaged interior that allows you to choose between extra legroom in the back or a bigger boot. There’s also plenty of standard kit. Unfortunately, the Note doesn’t feel as grown-up to drive as its rival – although its diesel engine is more refined.
Figures
Skoda Fabia 1.4 TDI SE L Estate | Nissan Note 1.5 dCi Tekna | |
On-the-road price/total as tested | £17,385/£18,780 | £17,370/£17,370 |
Residual value (after 3yrs/30,000) | £8,119/46.7% | £7,886/45.4% |
Depreciation | £9,266 | £9,484 |
Annual tax liability std/higher rate | £485/£971 | £485/£970 |
Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) | £1,145/£1,908 | £937/£1,561 |
Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost | 11/£314/A/£0 | 9/£288/A/£0 |
Cost of 1st/2nd/3rd service | £479 (3yrs/30k miles) | £159/£249/£159 |
Length/wheelbase | 4,257/2,470mm | 4,100/2,600mm |
Height/width | 1,488/1,732mm | 1,530/1,695mm |
Engine | 3cyl in-line/1,422cc | 4cyl in-line/1,461cc |
Peak power | 89/3,000 bhp/rpm | 89/4,000 bhp/rpm |
Peak torque | 230/1,750 Nm/rpm | 200/1,750 Nm/rpm |
Transmission | 5-spd man/fwd | 5-spd man/fwd |
Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel | 45 litres/foam | 41 litres/foam |
Boot capacity (seats up/down) | 530/1,395 litres | 325-411/1,495 litres |
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight | 1,105/530/1,100kg | 1,132/415/450kg |
Turning circle/drag coefficient | 9.8 metres/0.31Cd | 10.7 metres/0.30Cd |
Basic warranty (miles)/recovery | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs |
Service intervals/UK dealers | Variable/135 | 18,000 miles (1yr)/225 |
Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. | 1st/4th | 22nd/25th |
Euro NCAP: Adult/child/ped./stars | 81/81/69/69/5* | 86/82/58/70/4 |
0-60/30-70mph | 11.7/12.8 secs | 11.4/11.7 secs |
30-50mph in 3rd/4th | 4.7/8.2 secs | 4.9/7.2 secs |
50-70mph in 5th | 11.9 secs | 12.3 secs |
Top speed/rpm at 70mph | 114mph/2,100rpm | 111mph/2,100rpm |
Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph | 48.3/35.2/9.0m | 50.4/36.5/9.1m |
Noise levels outside/idle/30/70mph | 77/60/67/72dB | 77/55/54/74dB |
Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range | 56.4/12.5/558 miles | 68.9/15.3/621 miles |
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 70.6/91.1/83.1 mpg | 67.3/88.3/80.7mpg |
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 15.5/20.0/18.3mpl | 14.8/19.4/17.8mpl |
Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket | 134/88g/km/14% | 110/90g/km/14% |
Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/camera | Six/yes/yes/no | Six/yes/no/yes |
Auto gearbox/stability/cruise control | £1,000/yes/yes | No/no/yes |
Climate control/leather/heated seats | Yes/no/£180 | Yes/part/no |
Met paint/xenon lights/keyless entry | £535/no/£160 | £500/no/yes |
Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth | No/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes/yes |