Subaru Outback vs Skoda Superb Outdoor
New Subaru Outback offers a practical estate alternative to an SUV. Can it leave Skoda’s Superb Outdoor trailing in the mud?
If you want a car with plenty of practicality, lots of comfort and decent off-road ability, your choice isn’t only limited to an SUV. There’s a growing group of high-riding estates that offer vast amounts of space, come loaded with useful kit and won’t get flummoxed by a patch of wet grass, which provide an alternative to a conventional 4x4.
This is exactly what Subaru’s new Outback aims to deliver and – now in its fifth generation – it’s more upmarket than ever. It might not boast the same sense of style as most off-roaders, but its rugged looks and great all-terrain capability have huge appeal – and it’s cheaper than many SUVs, too.
The four-wheel-drive Subaru has to face some stiff competition in this class, though. We’ve lined up another all-round family estate to rival it here, in the form of the Skoda Superb Outdoor Plus 4x4 with the firm’s punchy 168bhp turbodiesel and DSG gearbox. It’s one of the best off-road estates on sale, and although we’ll see an all-new Superb later this year, the current car still has a lot to offer.
To find out if the latest Outback has what it takes to beat the soon-to-be-replaced Skoda, we put the two cars head-to-head both on and off-road.
More reviews
In-depth reviews
Long-term tests
Road tests
Used car tests
Click the links above to read individual reviews, and scroll down to see which rugged estate car comes out on top...
Head-to-head
Towing ability
With their four-wheel-drive traction and torquey diesels, these two cars are perfect tow vehicles. The Skoda has a slight advantage, thanks to a towing capacity of 2,000kg, compared to 1,800kg for the Outback. Skoda offers a detachable towbar for £255, while Subaru has a similar set-up for£329, or a retractable version for £917.
Rugged design
Both cars get extra styling cues to highlight the off-road element. The big plastic bumpers look tougher and should stand up to abuse better on uneven ground. While the Skoda better combines this with the standard Superb’s more elegant looks, the Outback is more stylish than before.
Safety kit
Subaru’s EyeSight set-up uses two cameras mounted above the rear-view mirror to detect objects ahead. The lenses can even recognise the colour of brake lights to slow the car earlier, helping boost safety by applying the brakes to try to avoid a crash.
• We test Subaru's Eyesight safety system
Verdict
1st place: Skoda Superb Outdoor
Even though the current Superb is on the way out, it beats the Subaru to the top spot due to its blend of quality, performance and massive practicality. The Outdoor’s design changes give a touch of extra style, but ultimately off-road ability isn’t great. However, owners aren’t likely to venture far off the beaten track, and on the road the Superb Outdoor is surefooted and more alert.
2nd place: Subaru Outback
It’s hard to ignore the Outback’s standard spec, but next to the Skoda it still doesn’t have much of a premium feel. Add in the fact it’s slower, not as enjoyable to drive, less economical and pricier to buy, and the Subaru’s superior off-road performance simply isn’t enough to send it to the top of the class. It’s a big improvement over the old car, though, and it’s good value, too.
Coming soon: Is it worth waiting for the Volvo V60 Cross Country?
The V60 Cross Country is set to slot into the range between Volvo's V40 Cross Country and XC70. If you want 4WD, you need the D4 SE Nav Geartronic auto, but this costs a hefty £35,275. The 2WD cars are better value and still have the looks of a crossover estate.
Key specs:
Skoda Superb Outdoor Plus 2.0 TDI 170 4x4 DSG | Subaru Outback 2.0D SE Premium Lineartronic | |
On-the-road price/total as tested | £30,240/£30,775 | £32,995/£32,995 |
Residual value (after 3yrs/30,000) | £12,474/41.3% | £13,050/39.6% |
Depreciation | £17,766 | £19,945 |
Annual tax liability std/higher rate | £1,651/£3,302 | £1,900/£3,800 |
Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) | £1,900/£3,166 | £2,175/£3,625 |
Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost | 23/£399/F/£145 | 26/£425/G/£180 |
Servicing costs | £479 (3yrs/30k) | TBC |
Length/wheelbase | 4,833/2,761mm | 4,815/2,745mm |
Height/width | 1,511/1,817mm | 1,605/1,840mm |
Engine | 4cyl in-line/1,968cc | 4cyl flat-four/1,998cc |
Peak power | 168/4,200 bhp/rpm | 148/3,600 bhp/rpm |
Peak torque | 350/1,750 Nm/rpm | 350/1,600 Nm/rpm |
Transmission | 6-spd auto/4wd | CVT/4wd |
Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel | 60 litres/sealant | 60 litres/sealant |
Boot capacity (seats up/down) | 633/1,865 litres | 559/1,848 litres |
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight | 1,581/638/2,000kg | 1,691/439/1,800kg |
Turning circle/drag coefficient | 10.8 metres/0.29Cd | 11.0 metres/N/A |
Basic warranty (miles)/recovery | 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs | 5yrs (100,000)/3yrs |
Service intervals/UK dealers | 20,000 miles (2yrs)/135 | 12,000 miles (1yr)/59 |
Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. | 1st/5th | 16th/4th |
Euro NCAP: Adult/child/ped./stars | 90/81/50/5 (2009) | 85/87/70/5 (2014) |
0-60/30-70mph | 8.5/8.4 secs | 10.4/10.7 secs |
30-50mph in 3rd/4th | 3.6/4.9 secs | 4.0/4.8 secs |
50-70mph in 5th/6th | 7.1/9.1 secs/N/A | 7.0/9.1/11.1 secs |
Top speed/rpm at 70mph | 135mph/2,100rpm | 119mph/1,900rpm |
Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph | 51.2/37.0/9.3m | 50.6/38.1/9.7m |
Noise levels outside/idle/30/70mph | 65/55/58/60dB | 63/60/66/68dB |
Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range | 34.0/7.5/449 miles | 29.7/6.5/392 miles |
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 49.6/55.4/41.5mpg | 37.7/53.3/46.3mpg |
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined | 10.9/12.2/9.1mpl | 8.3/11.7/10.2mpl |
Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket | 223/149g/km/27% | 255/159g/km/29% |
Airbags/Isofix/park. sensors/camera | Seven/yes/rear/no | Seven/yes/no/yes |
Automatic box/stability/cruise control | Yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/yes |
Climate control/leather/heated seats | Yes/yes/£250 | Yes/yes/yes |
Metallic paint/xenon lights/keyless go | £535/£1,150/£400 | Yes/no/yes |
Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth | Yes/yes/yes/yes | Yes/yes/no/yes |