Skip advert
Advertisement

New Mercedes-AMG S 63 E Performance 2025 review: a truly unique saloon car

Mercedes unleashes its most powerful plug-in hybrid S-Class yet, but the S 63 isn't the all-rounder you might have expected

Overall Auto Express rating

4.0

How we review cars
Find your Mercedes S-Class
Compare deals from trusted partners on this car and previous models.
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Value my car
Fast, no-nonsense car selling
Value my car

Verdict

The S 63 isn’t the all-rounder you might have expected of a plug-in hybrid Mercedes S-Class. For that, we’d point you towards the excellent 580 e. There’s a bit of pageantry in the S 63, showcasing how wonderful it can be when seemingly conflicting attributes are shaped into delivering a unique driving experience. Mercedes has done a pretty convincing job of turning its luxury limousine into a performance saloon. 

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Mercedes S-Class is a car that you enjoy from the rear seats as much as the front, but the S 63 E Performance is a bit different. It’s very much focused on thrilling the driver before anything else. 

While the S-Class gains more technology with each generation to create an ever-more luxurious experience, the S 63’s headline isn’t a new refrigerator, sound system or even massaging seats…it’s the fact that with 792bhp and 1,430Nm of torque, this is the most powerful S-Class to date. 

The majority of that power comes from a familiar twin-turbocharged four-litre V8 with 604bhp, but it’s supplemented by a plug-in hybrid system that uses a 187bhp rear-mounted electric motor, powered by a battery pack situated above the rear axle. 

That battery pack is a mere 13.1kWh in capacity, which is half the size of the unit in the S 580 e plug-in hybrid. As a result, there’s a rather meek 21-mile EV range in the S 63, while the S 580 e is good for 63 miles of emissions-free motoring, according to Mercedes. 

Indeed, the S 63 is best considered a regular non-hybrid muscle car in some ways. Don’t go looking for urban-focused, EV-only driving, because you’ll only be disappointed with the range. Instead, think of the hybrid unit as a power boost and let it improve the fuel efficiency of its own accord – in Sport and Sport Plus modes, the S 63 will recharge the battery to some extent, though this can be quite taxing on fuel economy in the process. 

Advertisement - Article continues below
Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement - Article continues below

To discount the S 63 on its seemingly token electric range would be missing the point of this car entirely. Despite the plug-in hybrid taking the kerbweight up to a significant 2,595kg, the S 63 will go from 0-62mph in 3.3 seconds and with the optional AMG Driver’s Package, hurtle towards a de-restricted 180mph top speed. 

The 21-inch wheels are clad with some very wide Michelin tyres and of course, there’s Mercedes’ 4MATIC all-wheel-drive system on board, too. As a result, it never feels like straight-line traction is an issue in the S 63, despite the monstrous power figures. The delivery of power is particularly impressive, not because of how much forward momentum the S 63 can build up in a short amount of time, but because the communication behind the electric motor and petrol engine is pretty much unidentifiable. 

There’s a slightly muted V8 rumble from inside the cabin (as you might expect with the S-Class’ extensive sound-deadening) and selecting Sport or Sport Plus amplifies that quad-tip exhaust. The nine-speed automatic gearbox holds on to gears for longer in those sportier drive modes, which allows you to bask in some lovely deep overruns. The gearbox itself feels well suited to the S 63’s inherent dynamism. There’s a more abrupt upshift in Sport Plus (although perhaps not as noticeable as we’d like), with electrical assistance smoothing out shifts whether you’re cruising or pushing on. 

Although there’s air-suspension, the S 63 doesn’t muffle road imperfections to the same degree as its less performance-focused siblings. The ride is firm at low speeds – perhaps surprisingly so given that this is still an S-Class with the large wheels clattering into potholes too often – although the faster you go, the better it becomes. 

Advertisement - Article continues below
Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement - Article continues below

A by-product of the S 63’s chassis tuning is that it attacks corners in a way that belies its 5.3-metre length. Helping to give this S-Class almost a C-Class level of compactness behind the wheel are the rear-wheel steering and active anti-roll bars. With them constantly monitoring the road surface and your inputs, you can carry much more speed into bends than you’d think – although reassuringly, it never feels like an alien experience that’s devoid of communication with the road surface. The carbon ceramic brakes manage to scrub off speed well, although the brake pedal feels notchy.

The steering is quicker than you’d find in lesser S-Class variants, but it is perhaps the weakest link when it comes to delivering the confidence you need to really throw the S 63 around. Balancing the throttle in the mid-corner isn’t something most S-Class buyers would find particularly relevant, although in the S 63 you do have to be on your guard against unsolicited understeer with that long, loping front end. 

You might wonder why this fire-breathing version is needed in the S-Class line-up, when Mercedes already offers the more powerful, lighter, 831bhp plug-in hybrid GT 4-Door S 63 E. Well, the S 63 E Performance is a much more subtle offering than the 4-Door and while the ride misses the target for rear-seat occupants, there’s a real understated charisma to be enjoyed, mixed with genuinely enjoyable driving dynamics. 

Model:Mercedes-AMG S 63 E Performance
Price:£186,015
On sale:Now
Powertrain:4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol plus electric motor
Power/torque:792bhp/1, 430Nm
Transmission:Nine-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
0-62mph/top speed:3.3 seconds/155mph
Economy:64.2mpg
EV range:62 miles
CO2:100 g/km
Size (L/W/H):5,336/2,130/1,515mm
Skip advert
Advertisement
Senior news reporter

A keen petrol-head, Alastair Crooks has a degree in journalism and worked as a car salesman for a variety of manufacturers before joining Auto Express in Spring 2019 as a Content Editor. Now, as our senior news reporter, his daily duties involve tracking down the latest news and writing reviews.

New & used car deals

Mercedes S Class

Mercedes S Class

RRP £98,015Used from £56,250
Dacia Spring

Dacia Spring

RRP £14,995Avg. savings £1,676 off RRP*
Hyundai Tucson

Hyundai Tucson

RRP £29,540Avg. savings £3,974 off RRP*Used from £15,633
Renault Clio

Renault Clio

RRP £15,940Avg. savings £2,827 off RRP*Used from £9,000
* Average savings are calculated daily based on the best dealer prices on Auto Express vs manufacturer RRP
Skip advert
Advertisement

Have you considered?

BMW i7 review
BMW i7 - front tracking

BMW i7 review

In-depth reviews
14 Aug 2024
New BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport review: RWD luxury EV with a sporty twist
BMW i7 - front

New BMW i7 eDrive50 M Sport review: RWD luxury EV with a sporty twist

Road tests
9 Aug 2024

Most Popular

Car Deal of the Day: sleek ‘n’ sporty Mazda 3 hatch at just £173 a month
Mazda 3 front corner tracking

Car Deal of the Day: sleek ‘n’ sporty Mazda 3 hatch at just £173 a month

Mazda’s high-quality family hatch might cost less than you expect with low initial payment and monthly fee
News
2 Feb 2025
Volvo XC40 alternatives: New and used substitutes for the stylish Swedish SUV
Volvo XC40 alternatives - header image

Volvo XC40 alternatives: New and used substitutes for the stylish Swedish SUV

The Volvo XC40 is a superb family SUV, but what if you want something different? We’ve come up with six great new and used alternative choices
Features
1 Feb 2025
Car brands like Tesla and Vauxhall risk falling behind due to poor leadership
Opinion - Mike Rutherford

Car brands like Tesla and Vauxhall risk falling behind due to poor leadership

Mike Rutherford thinks manufacturers like Tesla and Vauxhall could be left behind due to poor management decisions
Opinion
2 Feb 2025