Skip advert
Advertisement
In-depth reviews

Nissan Pulsar 2014-2018 review - MPG, CO2 and Running Costs

Small capacity engines mean decent economy, while depreciation makes the Pulsar a sound used buy

MPG, CO2 and Running Costs rating

3.8

How we review cars
Find your Nissan Pulsar
Offers from our trusted partners on this car and its predecessors...
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Value my car
Fast, no-nonsense car selling
Value my car
Advertisement

The most economical Pulsar is the 1.5 dCi diesel, which has claimed economy of 78.5mpg and ducks under the 100g/km of CO2 mark at 94g/km. It’s only available with a manual gearbox, however.

For an automatic shifter, you’ll need the 1.2 DIG-T petrol and its Xtronic CVT. It added around £1,350 to the Pulsar’s list price, and hurts efficiency, dropping the 1.2-litre engine’s claimed figures from 56.5mpg and 115g/km to 55.4mpg and 119g/km. The 1.2-litre petrol is also cheaper to buy outright than the diesel. 

The 1.6-litre DIG-T 190 option is predictably the least efficient, yet even this model returns a credible 49.5mpg and has CO2 emissions from 134g/km. Maximum claimed range on a full tank is 571 miles for the 1.2 petrol, 484 miles for the 1.6 petrol, and a whopping 793 miles for the diesel. 

Insurance groups 

Insurance for the Pulsar ranges from group 10 for the 1.2-litre petrol, but only if you choose a spec level that includes Forward Emergency Braking – that means Acenta, n-tec or Tekna. The basic Visia doesn’t have this feature, and the insurance is bumped up a couple of groups to 12 as a result. It’s the same story across the engine range.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Tekna spec DIG-T 190 has the highest group rating, at 18. In fact, opting for Tekna spec with any of the engine options bumps the rating up by one group.

All in all the rates are competitive though, with the Pulsar undercutting the Volkswagen Golf by a couple of groups or more across the board.

Depreciation 

The Pulsar offers a clear demonstration of the increased desirability of crossovers and SUVs when compared to hatchbacks. The five-door Pulsar is the hatchback equivalent of the Qashqai, as it uses the same platform, engines and technology as the SUV. However, depreciation is in the region of 34-40 per cent, which is some 8 per cent lower than it is for the Qashqai.

Depreciation relative to the Pulsar's hatchback rivals isn't so great, either. It's at the lower end of the market alongside the likes of the Peugeot 308 and Vauxhall Astra, and even behind cars like the Renault Megane and SEAT Leon.

The upside of this depreciation is that the Pulsar offers pretty good value for money on the second-hand market, and could be a decent purchase for anybody after a well equipped family car that doesn't desire the high-riding driving position or SUV looks of the Qashqai.

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Ford Capri review
Ford Capri - front

Ford Capri review

This is no sports car, nor even a retro reboot – rather a capable, refined and well-built EV that happens to sport a controversial name
In-depth reviews
29 Oct 2024
New Audi RS 3 2024 review: is there a new hyper-hatch king?
Audi RS 3 - front

New Audi RS 3 2024 review: is there a new hyper-hatch king?

The Audi RS 3 renews hostilities with the Mercedes-AMG A 45, but this time it might just have the edge
Road tests
27 Oct 2024
Hot new Abarth 600e is the performance outfit’s most powerful car ever
Abarth 600e - front

Hot new Abarth 600e is the performance outfit’s most powerful car ever

The fiery electric SUV uses Abarth’s own newly developed e-motor that produces up to 278bhp
News
28 Oct 2024