Skip advert
Advertisement

Councils plan “unfair” yellow box junction enforcement fines

An RAC investigation finds that 90 per cent of proposed box junction enforcement sites have issues

Yellow box junction

Councils applying for new powers to enforce traffic offences at yellow box junctions risk fining drivers unfairly, with more than half of the proposed enforcement sites directly contravening government guidelines.

That’s the finding of the RAC motoring organisation, which commissioned chartered engineer Sam Wright to review all 111 of the current proposals from 27 councils. Wright, an expert formerly employed to manage yellow box design and approvals for Transport for London, found problems with 91 per cent of the yellow box sites proposed, while a shocking 61 per cent “directly contravene” existing government guidelines.

As a result of Wright’s research, the RAC is calling on the Department for Transport to carry out an urgent review of its guidelines to clarify “what is and what isn’t enforceable”.

Advertisement - Article continues below

“Enforcing yellow boxes means that the driver of a vehicle overhanging a box by any amount for just a moment can get a ticket,” said RAC spokesman Simon Williams. “Yet many drivers end up stopped or trapped in these junctions through no fault of their own. It is not only imperative, but a moral duty to ensure that fines are fair, justified and that the appeals’ process is consistent across the country.”

According to the organisation’s review of the 111 yellow boxes where councils have so far applied for powers to fine drivers, 40 have visibility issues, 16 are on the side of the road opposite T- junctions which the DFT says “serve no useful purpose”, 18 extend so far beyond junctions they are non-compliant, and 9 are in non-permitted locations.

Tellingly, Wright’s assessment of the visibility issues at many sites does not factor-in the poor condition of many yellow boxes, with painted lines worn away by years of traffic use.

 “While many boxes are barely visible at the moment due to a lack of maintenance, I chose to ignore this on the assumption that lines will be refreshed prior to enforcement,” the engineer said. “There are many changes needed to improve yellow box law and enforcement. However, as a minimum it is not unreasonable to expect that authorities should undertake comprehensive audits of boxes prior to enforcement to assess all issues.

According to Wright and the RAC, there’s no evidence that such audits are being carried out.

Click here for our guide on box junctions, including the rules and the penalties for breaking them...

Skip advert
Advertisement
Current affairs and features editor

Chris covers all aspects of motoring life for Auto Express. Over a long career he has contributed news and car reviews to brands such as Autocar, WhatCar?, PistonHeads, Goodwood and The Motor Trader.

Find a car with the experts

Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

New Citroen Holidays 2025 review: a cheaper and cheerful VW California campervan rival
Citroen Holidays - front

New Citroen Holidays 2025 review: a cheaper and cheerful VW California campervan rival

The new Citroen Holidays is the perfect option for those that want to camp on a budget
Road tests
15 Apr 2025
Carbon fibre could be banned as EU classifies it as a hazardous substance
Czinger teases 21C's carbon fibre bodywork

Carbon fibre could be banned as EU classifies it as a hazardous substance

Particulates emitted by the disposal of carbon fibre can be harmful to both machinery and human health
News
14 Apr 2025
How green are electric cars? The truth about EV environmental impact and carbon footprints
Polestar 3 - front full width

How green are electric cars? The truth about EV environmental impact and carbon footprints

New figures from Polestar cast light on the big questions around EV sustainability and environmental impact compared to petrol cars
News
15 Apr 2025